Great article!
It starts out a bit slow, but the article really gets one to open their eyes! It really makes sense why the government pushes a meat-loving diet, errr, or, at least does nothing to promote a environmentally friendly veg*n diet. I knew that a vegetarian diet was better for the environment, but this article pointed out some things that I hadn't thought about.
Here is a clip from it that got to me:
Everyone around the world today only knows what our parents and society has told us and what we have seen in the media. And what do we see? Meat is what everyone eats and meat is what wealthy people eat. Our government has a lot to lose if meat consumption is cut back. The government collects taxes from every piece of the puzzle-seeds, water, labor, fuel, equipment-everything.
Think about it: They tax the seeds the farmer buys, they tax the water the seeds need to grow, they tax the sale of the equipment used to plow the field, they tax the labor used to plow the field, then they tax the shipment of the crops, they tax the sale of the crops to the livestock producers, they tax the equipment used to produce the livestock, they tax the labor used to produce livestock, they tax the water consumed by the livestock, they tax the shipment of the livestock to the slaughterhouse, they tax the labor at the slaughterhouse, the equipment at the slaughterhouse, they tax the shipment of the meat to the grocery, they tax the sale to the grocery, and then they tax the labor to set up and sell the meat. Oh yeah, and they tax the grocery and the slaughterhouse for the packaging and equipment used to package the meat for resale.
Sounds like a great business! They get their cut all the way through. If we were to cut out the livestock and just shipped the crops right to the grocery, the government would lose money.
Do you know who wrote this article? It drives me crazy when there are no bylines or citations or anything.
(I've just outed myself as a research methodologist and NERD!)
Well, I found it from a Google search. But at the bottom of the webpage it says:
Article written by Timothy B. Rutherford and has a link, the link is an email.
Wow, am I thick or what? I guess I got a little distracted by the Albert Einstein tag, although I know the QUOTE was attributed to him and not the article. Ha, thanks, SQ.
awesome article... very logical, which is lacking in most people (meateaters), it seems.
GAHH sometimes i hate that so much in the US is geared toward money instead of the well-being of the country...world...citizens...environmet...etc....etc. Really chars my buns! >:(
Nice. The thing that is kind of misleading about the article though is that it's talking about only "livestock" used for meat production. The animals raised for dairy and egg production also need crops grown for them too. We can't forget about them. It's not just meat.
Nice. The thing that is kind of misleading about the article though is that it's talking about only "livestock" used for meat production. The animals raised for dairy and egg production also need crops grown for them too. We can't forget about them. It's not just meat.
Yep, don't forget about them!