You are here

VegNews Using MEAT Photos??

http://www.quarrygirl.com/2011/04/13/rant-veg-news-is-putting-the-meat-into-vegan-issues/

Have you heard about this yet? Vegan blogger Quarrygirl posted that VegNews has been using stock photographs of meat products, parading them as vegan dishes! This really saddens me, as I look to VegNews as my go-to publication for all things vegan. I feel this is lacking any journalistic integrity, and honestly, is just plain lazy. You only need to look as far as their sister site, vegweb.com, to see the thousands of beautiful vegan food photographs!

What do you guys think about this? If you subscribe to VegNews, will you continue to do so?

Their press release is what really gets me.  Is it just me, or does it seem like they're trying to play the victim - also while patting themselves on the back for being on shelves with Oprah and Martha Stewart?  I mean, what's with the first sentence?  "The entire VegNews family is deeply saddened with the dialogue that has transpired over the last 12 hours."  Well, first of all: You can't be saddened "with" something; you're saddened BY something.  But more to the point, WHAT are they sad about, exactly?  That their loyal readers are upset about this & talking about it?  That they got caught?  Wha huh?

I just feel like this whole thing would have blown over quite easily if they would have just apologized & pledged to find a better way of doing things in the future.  That non-apology statement just pissed me off.  I was giving them the benefit of the doubt when I first read about this.  I didn't want to rush to judgment about the ONLY vegan magazine in existence - and one I really enjoy reading...  But their dick attitude has me considering canceling my subscription.

0 likes

I agree, Jess....They genuinely, royally fucked up and should have made a sincere apology from the moment this story got out.
I also thought, "Hey, at least WML made a quick response available to Us here at VW! This official response seems to cover all the bases...." but then I finished the letter and noticed a clear lack of an apology, and the vague notion that they'll continue to use meat photos in the magazine for an indefinite period of time.

Do they not realize that paying money (even if it's only a little) to a stock photo site will directly pay the photographer for those images? That someone is essentially collecting royalties every time they decide to use a photo of DEAD FUCKING ANIMALS?!?

Paying for meat-filled stock photos is like buying a wool coat or leather jacket from an outlet mall:  Sure, a person can save some money and not give as much money to the retailer because it's being sold at a discount price to a middle-man.....but that person is still giving money to the retailer, whose business is (at least in part) contributing to a supplier who has tortured, maimed, and killed some animals just so that product could go on the shelves.

OH JEEZ, VEGAN RIBS ARE SOOOO HARD TO MAKE AND PHOTOGRAPH! *boohoo*
Gaorok forbid they actually look around on the fucking site that they now own.......

http://vegweb.com/recipephotos/albums/userpics/115701/normal_tasty_ribs.jpg

But if Oprah and Martha Stewart don't like this amateur photo, why would any of the subscribers?!?

0 likes

Preach it, sista!  I totally agree.

One other thing...  Even if I maintain my subscription, I am going to feel gross drooling over any pictures of food that are featured in the magazine!  Last night I was looking at old issues of VN, and I felt sad not knowing if a picture was of a vegan dish, or if it was of dead animal parts.  I don't find non-vegan food even remotely appealing, so I was grossed out!  I mean, sure, I find potato salad appealing, and I find mac & "cheese" appealing - but once I know that something isn't vegan, it moves into "unappealing" territory & I don't want to look at it.  :-\  Being vegan, my brain & my tastebuds are completely intertwined, and it's the same reason I no longer look at a plate of fried chicken & think, "Mmm!  YUM!"  I look at it & think, "Ugh, sad."  So that's where my brain goes now that I know so many images in VN aren't vegan!

I'd rather look at the TONS of beautiful vegan blogs out there that showcase how gorgeous & delicious plant foods are.  And that's free!

0 likes

No excuse for this, particularly when there are hundreds - if not THOUSANDS - of people who would volunteer to take vegan photos for the magazine just for a credit under the picture. 

My thoughts exactly. And if you've visited any of the vegan blogs anywhere on the net, you'd see that it's quite easy to take beautiful and enticing amateur photos of food. Even the response seems like a copout.

I totally agree with you both. I know that I, personally, would rather see amateur photographs which may or may not be of lesser quality but are VEGAN, than catch myself drooling over pictures of meat. This would be a fantastic opportunity to let non-pro photographers get published. I feel that the vegan community is good at bonding together and being accepting of "imperfection"--we support newly vegans who make mistakes, we offer advice when other vegans are in sticky situations, and I think we would all be comfortable with giving up some quality of images, as long as they were vegan photos. We'd be supporting other vegans, in the process.

This really stinks. A lot.

0 likes

Their press release is what really gets me.  Is it just me, or does it seem like they're trying to play the victim - also while patting themselves on the back for being on shelves with Oprah and Martha Stewart?  I mean, what's with the first sentence?  "The entire VegNews family is deeply saddened with the dialogue that has transpired over the last 12 hours."  Well, first of all: You can't be saddened "with" something; you're saddened BY something.  But more to the point, WHAT are they sad about, exactly?  That their loyal readers are upset about this & talking about it?  That they got caught?  Wha huh?

I just feel like this whole thing would have blown over quite easily if they would have just apologized & pledged to find a better way of doing things in the future.  That non-apology statement just pissed me off.  I was giving them the benefit of the doubt when I first read about this.  I didn't want to rush to judgment about the ONLY vegan magazine in existence - and one I really enjoy reading...  But their dick attitude has me considering canceling my subscription.

x2. I got so bored when they were talking about Oprah and Martha Stewart--no fucking connection to the issue whatsoever. But that's cool, I guess. This has been handled SO POORLY. What a bunch of crap.

0 likes

I made a post about this yesterday and it was DELETED.  :(

http://vegweb.com/index.php?topic=39751.0

0 likes

I added this to the VegNews site, and I'll repeat it here. I am disappointed in their response. But I do understand; I run an internal corporate magazine, and while there's a vast difference I am not cancelling my subscription.

I also agree that those who are reacting with extreme outrage are often the same folks who alienate others from the vegan community, who look down on folks who aren't vegan but might be trying, or might be interested, with such contempt that it paints the entire community as a pseudo-cult of fanatics.

Furthermore, those who are suggesting VegNews is contributing to the abust and exploitation of animals by using stock photos - please. Get over yourself. I certainly hope those of that mind never shop at a grocery store that sells meat, eggs, dairy, or honey. Or visits a farmer's market that might have stands selling the same. Or eat anyplace that offers even a single non-vegan item. Or buys clothes anywhere that sell wool or leather. None of us are perfect, and every purchase we make results in pain, suffering, and probably even the death of some animal somewhere.

Personally, I'd like to see more people interested in veganism, not less. I'd like to see more people trying a few meatless meals a week and thinking about the food they eat. And the vitriolic crap I've seen some posters spew about this issue is exactly what's keeping some from making those initial steps. Keep it up folks, you're our own worst enemies.

0 likes

I also agree that those who are reacting with extreme outrage are often the same folks who alienate others from the vegan community, who look down on folks who aren't vegan but might be trying, or might be interested, with such contempt that it paints the entire community as a pseudo-cult of fanatics.

Furthermore, those who are suggesting VegNews is contributing to the abust and exploitation of animals by using stock photos - please. Get over yourself. I certainly hope those of that mind never shop at a grocery store that sells meat, eggs, dairy, or honey. Or visits a farmer's market that might have stands selling the same. Or eat anyplace that offers even a single non-vegan item. Or buys clothes anywhere that sell wool or leather. None of us are perfect, and every purchase we make results in pain, suffering, and probably even the death of some animal somewhere.

Personally, I'd like to see more people interested in veganism, not less. I'd like to see more people trying a few meatless meals a week and thinking about the food they eat. And the vitriolic crap I've seen some posters spew about this issue is exactly what's keeping some from making those initial steps. Keep it up folks, you're our own worst enemies.

I sort of don't see your connection here, at all. What does anyone's "vitriolic crap" (and since you didn't quote a post, I have no idea what you are referencing) have to do with alienating people from taking the initial step to veganism? This issue doesn't really have anything to do with how we choose to be viewed by the outside world or how we react to omnivores. This is an internal issue, one that affects an entity, one which we felt was an ally. Veg*ns get enough resistance from the outside world--can we not trust VegNews to be honest with us? What's next? Casein in Daiya cheese? This puts us on alert, when we previously felt safe. VegNews is a magazine directed toward the veg*n community, we are the veg*n community, we have a response to what we perceive as being lied to. VegNews exists in a capitalist system--if we, the subscribers, don't like what they're doing, we have more than the right to discontinue our relationship with them.

I just don't understand your reasoning in your second paragraph above. We understand that we make imperfect choices, but we try our best to reduce suffering and to make the best choice possible. Yes, we may shop at a farmers' market that sells meat, but WE WILL NOT PURCHASE SAID MEAT.There is a huge moral difference here. Meat photos are NOT the best choice possible. There are other options, and I think the discussion surrounding those other options might be quite beneficial to VegWeb and the veg*n community.

0 likes

This is so nasty, I'm really glad I never subscribed to it.  :-\

I totally agree with JessaCita; I would feel so ashamed to find food appetizing, and then discover that it wasn't even applicable to my diet!

And seriously, what the hell. Maybe I'm naive but when a recipe is put up in a magazine, shouldn't the images that are used actually be FROM the recipe? It just seems dishonest not to, even if the stock photos were vegan, because when you look at a recipe photo there's an expectation that when you make the food, it'll end up resembling the picture.

UGH. Like everyone else has said, it would be SO easy for them to even post some sort of contest on this site where people can submit their own vegan stock photos. It would be FREE, fun for us, and save them all of this BS.

0 likes

What's next? Casein in Daiya cheese?

You better not have jinxed this.  :help!:

0 likes

What's next? Casein in Daiya cheese?

You better not have jinxed this.  :help!:

God, I know. I thought about that when I wrote it. I'd cry. A lot.

0 likes

Okay, one more big rant and then I'll be done (for a while). Since my iPod stopped working a few months back, I have decided to spend my entire runs with myself, in solitude, having internal conversations and pondering life. So...I have 8 miles of bullshit to catch you all up on.

I finally realized what has upset me so much about this issue. As a vegan living in the Midwest, I am almost completely solitary in my endeavors. I know one vegan (my boyfriend, who doesn't really feel the need to do much research/reading on his own. Fine) and 2 vegetarians. It's not like I can go out to eat and tell someone I want something vegan, as people around here do not even understand the word. I am not even able to ask if something has dairy, as I realized not many people even understand what that word means. I have to run through the list with the waiter: Does it have milk? Butter? Cheese? Yogurt? Something that didn't have dairy a minute before, now has yogurt. You get the picture. This creates a huge thread of mistrust in my mind. I make almost all of my own food, as I do not have access to many things people in cities do, such as Gardein and other convenience foods, and we just got Daiya here a few months ago. I am extremely paranoid about my food and what is in it, as I do not trust the people around me to be smart enough to know what's going into the dish. For holidays, I still make our parents run through the recipes, just so I can be sure they didn't miss something and dump in honey.

In my isolation, I have grown comfortable knowing what I can trust and what I cannot. I know that when I go to Qdoba, I will see meat, and I have come to accept this. I also know that there isn't a single vegan thing on the menu at 90% of the restaurants in my town. I also accept this. In my paranoia, I feel comfortable within a certain confine. VegWeb is one of the places I feel "safe" and normal. I don't have to explain in detail why breeding Siberian Foxes for pets is wrong. I can skip the bullshit explanation and just get to bitching immediately with you guys. Also, VegNews was another one of the safe places. Within those pages, I was able to feel normal, like I belonged to a bigger community. I did not question the veganness of the recipes or photos, and I trusted the company to have vegan practices. They broke this trust. I let my guard down, something I barely ever do within my vegan world, and they completely fucked it up. And you know what the worst part is? They don't give a shit. They do not seem to fully comprehend what this breach of trust means to me. I stopped being paranoid that cheese was going to come jumping out at me from the pages. I stopped scanning the recipes with the thought in my mind of what I was going to have to change to make it vegan. I felt completely at home there, and they completely do not seem to care.

In short, I feel like a spurned lover. I gave them my trust, and they breached that contract. We had an agreement, that they were a vegan company and I was buying their product because of this. They. Screwed. Up. Not as much in the practice (but, yes, in the practice), but in that piss poor excuse for an apology. You really don't get it, do you VegNews?

0 likes

One other thing...  Even if I maintain my subscription, I am going to feel gross drooling over any pictures of food that are featured in the magazine! 

This.

And seriously, what the hell. Maybe I'm naive but when a recipe is put up in a magazine, shouldn't the images that are used actually be FROM the recipe? It just seems dishonest not to, even if the stock photos were vegan, because when you look at a recipe photo there's an expectation that when you make the food, it'll end up resembling the picture.

And this.  I guess we are naive.

0 likes

Okay, one more big rant and then I'll be done (for a while). Since my iPod stopped working a few months back, I have decided to spend my entire runs with myself, in solitude, having internal conversations and pondering life. So...I have 8 miles of bullshit to catch you all up on.

I finally realized what has upset me so much about this issue. As a vegan living in the Midwest, I am almost completely solitary in my endeavors. I know one vegan (my boyfriend, who doesn't really feel the need to do much research/reading on his own. Fine) and 2 vegetarians. It's not like I can go out to eat and tell someone I want something vegan, as people around here do not even understand the word. I am not even able to ask if something has dairy, as I realized not many people even understand what that word means. I have to run through the list with the waiter: Does it have milk? Butter? Cheese? Yogurt? Something that didn't have dairy a minute before, now has yogurt. You get the picture. This creates a huge thread of mistrust in my mind. I make almost all of my own food, as I do not have access to many things people in cities do, such as Gardein and other convenience foods, and we just got Daiya here a few months ago. I am extremely paranoid about my food and what is in it, as I do not trust the people around me to be smart enough to know what's going into the dish. For holidays, I still make our parents run through the recipes, just so I can be sure they didn't miss something and dump in honey.

In my isolation, I have grown comfortable knowing what I can trust and what I cannot. I know that when I go to Qdoba, I will see meat, and I have come to accept this. I also know that there isn't a single vegan thing on the menu at 90% of the restaurants in my town. I also accept this. In my paranoia, I feel comfortable within a certain confine. VegWeb is one of the places I feel "safe" and normal. I don't have to explain in detail why breeding Siberian Foxes for pets is wrong. I can skip the bullshit explanation and just get to bitching immediately with you guys. Also, VegNews was another one of the safe places. Within those pages, I was able to feel normal, like I belonged to a bigger community. I did not question the veganness of the recipes or photos, and I trusted the company to have vegan practices. They broke this trust. I let my guard down, something I barely ever do within my vegan world, and they completely fucked it up. And you know what the worst part is? They don't give a shit. They do not seem to fully comprehend what this breach of trust means to me. I stopped being paranoid that cheese was going to come jumping out at me from the pages. I stopped scanning the recipes with the thought in my mind of what I was going to have to change to make it vegan. I felt completely at home there, and they completely do not seem to care.

In short, I feel like a spurned lover. I gave them my trust, and they breached that contract. We had an agreement, that they were a vegan company and I was buying their product because of this. They. Screwed. Up. Not as much in the practice (but, yes, in the practice), but in that piss poor excuse for an apology. You really don't get it, do you VegNews?

I totally agree with 100% of this.  Where I live there isn't a single resturant in town with a vegan meal on the menu and very few with a vegetarian one.  When I say the word vegan people are more like to think of the Jody Foster movie than diet.  Fish and sometimes chicken are on the vegetarian menus.  Even at Qdoba, the only vegan-friendly place in town, the same servers (who know my daughter by name and give her free food) still ask me what meat I want on my Veggie burrito and if I'm sure about not wanting cheese/sour cream.  People here just don't get it.  I go to VN so that I don't feel alone.  I like having pictures with recipes so that I have some idea of what something is going to end up looking like.  Now I feel repulsed by the magazine.  I guess I will have to black out all the pictures or something before I consider using the recipes.  I could care less how pretty or widely published VN is (although I've NEVER EVER seen it in a store).  I buy it to feel connected to other vegans.  If they can't afford photos, then don't use any!  Honestly their response makes me more upset then anything. 

As far as the Daiya goes, my omni friend with a nursing daughter who is seriously allergic to milk protein and eggs eats it without any trouble.  So far, so good. 

0 likes

Well said, VR... I don't really understand 2 things: how a veg publication could think this would be unnoticed &/or inconsequential; and how they failed to see the fix for it (apologize/ stop doing it)... I understand 'financial necessity'; just not hypocrisy. Like others have said, if you don't have 'publication quality' photos, I'd prefer none at all-- and as VR said, I have this naive expectation (too much veg blog & VW participation, I guess!) that recipe photos may be, o, i don't know, a representation of the actual m'f'n recipe! ... that was my (silly) expectation even before veg eating set in... I don't think it's being hostile or intolerant or judgmental to say, well, what you're doing is not what i want, so i don't think i'll pay you for it. I do think it's foolish and short sighted of VN mgmt to respond in a way that came across as being so cavalier; like BP saying,' well yeah, the oil spill is regrettable, but it's just a bunch of fish & stuff, and we have financial imperatives, and we're saddened that this unfortunate event has come to your attention...'

I don't think pics of animal junk are as bad as EATING the shit; but this policy by VN was/ is clearly deceitful/ disrespectful of the community that supports it... and easy to fix, had they chosen to do so.

Hope this issue doesn't affect VW; WMLaura is cool, this site is awesome, don't delete this thread... thank you. (sigh)

0 likes

Its hard, part of me feels torn, I loved VegNews, especially for the pictures!  However, like others mentioned, it feels yucky thinking about those pics maybe being meat.  And, more importantly, they do, even in a smaller way, contribute to that slaughter, while also expanding the idea that vegan food doesn't look as appetizing as meat.

I hope they will issue a better apology, as the one they have didn't quite cut it for me. And deleting comments is downright horrible, it makes the whole situation seem all the more purposeful.

This is also surprizing to me because recently someone caught an ad in there for a non-vegan product, and they printed the letter from the reader and apologized, promising that they would be sure to check that in the future. So while in the past they have seemed always seemed hyper-vigilant for issues like this, I think the meat photos, which were purposefully done, would have gotten a better apology. (Or actually not been used at all)....

While I'm sure the other photos may require some additional funds, it would be a great way to showcase bloggers and other vegans photos!!!! If they start to do this I will be much more apt to keep my subscription.

0 likes

This is also surprizing to me because recently someone caught an ad in there for a non-vegan product, and they printed the letter from the reader and apologized, promising that they would be sure to check that in the future. So while in the past they have seemed always seemed hyper-vigilant for issues like this, I think the meat photos, which were purposefully done, would have gotten a better apology. (Or actually not been used at all)....

This is exactly what I was referring to! I remember recently reading this...That is why I am just like... WTF?!

0 likes

What's next? Casein in Daiya cheese?

You better not have jinxed this.  :help!:

That would be bad like Hip Whip and those oldschool vegan marshmallows that both ended up not being completely vegan.

0 likes

Hip Whip isn't vegan? what?!
Reminds me of the Stoney Field Soy Yogurt that they finally labeled as milk-derived after several years of me buying and eating it.

I agree that they should not have started the letter with their disappointment in readers' reactions (that is how *I*  "apologize" when I am not really sorry...."I am sorry that my actions made  you feel this way" -in other words: I don't think what I did was wrong).

And as far as exhausting all other options for photos....I never remember seeing a thread saying, "We need photographs of vegan food for VegNews" anywhere on VW...wouldn't that have been something to try? Were they too exhausted from looking for vegan photographers that they couldn't make a simple post like that? Or even just find photos on VW of vegan ribs and email the user to see if they could publish it?  Who would say NO to that? Not I!!!

If I saw that thread like that and it had no responses, I might believe them. I find it hard to believe they exhausted other options at all.

0 likes

OMG THEY USED A REAL MAC AND CHEESE PICTURE FOR MY RECIPE. I'M SO MAD.

0 likes

Pages

Log in or register to post comments